|
Post by Player Representative on Aug 9, 2022 13:27:09 GMT -8
RW Brock Boeser SNP 91 (30) 15M UFA 2034 NMC Cup or bust, our offense has been bad for this whole Era and Brock Boeser will change that. retro
|
|
|
Post by Iasi Scorpions GM on Aug 9, 2022 13:49:25 GMT -8
shouldn't teams atleast have to have the cap space to bid that amount lol
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Aug 9, 2022 14:03:51 GMT -8
You’ve always been allowed to go over the cap by 10% at Free Agency. I give you guys the benefit of the doubt on the stuff. There are moves he can make to clear the space. Some times guys don’t want to make drastic moves if they miss out.
How pissed would you be if you cleared the 9M that he needs (roughly) only to be out bid by someone else?
It’s always been the rule here and pretty sure at HLS too. Though it might be smaller %
|
|
|
Post by Iasi Scorpions GM on Aug 9, 2022 14:53:41 GMT -8
You’ve always been allowed to go over the cap by 10% at Free Agency. I give you guys the benefit of the doubt on the stuff. There are moves he can make to clear the space. Some times guys don’t want to make drastic moves if they miss out. How pissed would you be if you cleared the 9M that he needs (roughly) only to be out bid by someone else? It’s always been the rule here and pretty sure at HLS too. Though it might be smaller % Just imagine if you were somebody that had created the full space and weren't outbid but still lost, that would be really frustrating though. Also that is an 8year bid and shouldn't have even been looked at
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Aug 9, 2022 15:03:50 GMT -8
You’ve always been allowed to go over the cap by 10% at Free Agency. I give you guys the benefit of the doubt on the stuff. There are moves he can make to clear the space. Some times guys don’t want to make drastic moves if they miss out. How pissed would you be if you cleared the 9M that he needs (roughly) only to be out bid by someone else? It’s always been the rule here and pretty sure at HLS too. Though it might be smaller % Just imagine if you were somebody that had created the full space and weren't outbid but still lost, that would be really frustrating though. Also that is an 8year bid and shouldn't have even been looked at Nah, I get you. Just not sure what we can really about that. There was gonna be at least 5 or so teams disappointed. SFF used a tool available in that you’re allowed to do it. Me personally, I know hard it can be when you’re in cap trouble and have to move contracts. I wouldn’t want to be in that position of having to unload that much. I’d probably go your route. But there are risk to both. If you guys want to change that rule in the reboot we can definitely have that conversation. I’m gonna get a thread up soon for reboot discussion. So if you think teams shouldn’t be able to go over that much, definitely bring it up
|
|
|
Post by Iasi Scorpions GM on Aug 9, 2022 15:09:39 GMT -8
Just imagine if you were somebody that had created the full space and weren't outbid but still lost, that would be really frustrating though. Also that is an 8year bid and shouldn't have even been looked at Nah, I get you. Just not sure what we can really about that. There was gonna be at least 5 or so teams disappointed. SFF used a tool available in that you’re allowed to do it. Me personally, I know hard it can be when you’re in cap trouble and have to move contracts. I wouldn’t want to be in that position of having to unload that much. I’d probably go your route. But there are risk to both. If you guys want to change that rule in the reboot we can definitely have that conversation. I’m gonna get a thread up soon for reboot discussion. So if you think teams shouldn’t be able to go over that much, definitely bring it up Still an 8year contract that can't be given to a free agent. So this shouldn't have even been looked at. I understand the 10% now and will gladly use it in the future. But the 8 year part makes this bid void and if there are a few other guys that had bid 15M also it should go out to one of them, shouldn't it??
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Aug 9, 2022 15:17:35 GMT -8
Nah, I get you. Just not sure what we can really about that. There was gonna be at least 5 or so teams disappointed. SFF used a tool available in that you’re allowed to do it. Me personally, I know hard it can be when you’re in cap trouble and have to move contracts. I wouldn’t want to be in that position of having to unload that much. I’d probably go your route. But there are risk to both. If you guys want to change that rule in the reboot we can definitely have that conversation. I’m gonna get a thread up soon for reboot discussion. So if you think teams shouldn’t be able to go over that much, definitely bring it up Still an 8year contract that can't be given to a free agent. So this shouldn't have even been looked at. I understand the 10% now and will gladly use it in the future. But the 8 year part makes this bid void and if there are a few other guys that had bid 15M also it should go out to one of them, shouldn't it?? I actually hadn’t noticed it was 8 years. Tbh, SFF PMd me asking what the maximum offer he could offer was, and I told him 20% of the cap x 7. So this might be just an error of everyone going to fast on what year the contract expired I didn’t mean to say there were more at 15M. I actually don’t know. Question for PR. I know there were at least 5-6 offers of varying amounts Im pretty sure at end it was between you and SFF. SFF won their Division last season. It’s not like this is crazy that he took a deal at 15M to play there. But let me find out if 8 years was intentional or clerical error
|
|
|
Post by Texas Rattlesnakes GM on Aug 9, 2022 16:28:02 GMT -8
I bid 15 x 1 and lost out as well. I thought he was mine for sure. What can ya do? LOL
|
|
|
Post by retro on Aug 10, 2022 0:46:57 GMT -8
Yeah this is VOID. I actually offered 15M x 8 years
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Aug 10, 2022 10:02:03 GMT -8
I’m making a judgment call on this and am allowing him to stay in I don’t think it was an intentional illegal offer, and the 8th year wasn’t the reason he chose San Fran Deal has been amended. You’re good to go retro
|
|
|
Post by retro on Aug 10, 2022 10:02:39 GMT -8
I’m making a judgment call on this and am allowing him to stay in I don’t think it was an intentional illegal offer, and the 8th year wasn’t the reason he chose San Fran Deal has been amended. You’re good to go retro Thank you
|
|
|
Post by retro on Aug 10, 2022 10:12:00 GMT -8
I’m making a judgment call on this and am allowing him to stay in I don’t think it was an intentional illegal offer, and the 8th year wasn’t the reason he chose San Fran Deal has been amended. You’re good to go retro Oh yeah that was definitively not intentional. I actually thought that the problem was that the league was rebooting in a year and you couldn't offer more than 1 year.
|
|
|
Post by Iasi Scorpions GM on Aug 10, 2022 12:59:53 GMT -8
I meant to bid 16M and just screwed up does that mean I get him then?
|
|
|
Post by Atlanta Thrashers GM on Aug 10, 2022 14:32:02 GMT -8
I was going to bid 16.1M, but then I got high
|
|
|
Post by Aachen der Adlers GM on Aug 10, 2022 14:56:22 GMT -8
I was gonna send an offer, but then I got high
|
|
|
Post by Macon Whoopee GM on Aug 10, 2022 15:07:08 GMT -8
I was gonna send an offer, but then I got high I was gonna make up a lyric about Boeser, but then I got high.
|
|
|
Post by Milwaukee Mighty Drunks GM on Aug 11, 2022 7:25:20 GMT -8
yall are stealing my bit lol
|
|
|
Post by Macon Whoopee GM on Aug 11, 2022 7:30:24 GMT -8
yall are stealing my bit lol I was gonna steal your bit but then I got high...
|
|
|
Post by Iceland Crazy Vikings GM on Aug 11, 2022 9:34:22 GMT -8
I was gonna get high, but... oh wait, I did get high
|
|
|
Post by retro on Aug 11, 2022 11:27:16 GMT -8
I wanted to get high but than I got high.
|
|