|
|
Post by Seattle Spitfires GM on Jun 11, 2022 17:53:59 GMT -8
TO:  C Mason McTavish PLY 83 (22) 4M RFA 2028 LD Ryan Graves DFD 82 (30) 2.5M UFA 2026 RD Alex During OFD 76 (19) 1.5M RFA 2027 TO:   2nd 2026 for retaining $2M on Roslovic. TO: RW/C Jack Roslovic TWF 86 (28) 6.0M UFA 2026 [AMS pays: $2M; Cap Hit: $4M] LD Shayne Gostisbehere OFD 84 (32) 4.750M UFA 2026 NMC LW/RW Joel Kiviranta SNP 81 (29) 1.0M UFA 2026 Rivals trading... 😱😂😂 Accepts. |
|
|
|
Post by Sokolina Hussars GM on Jun 11, 2022 17:59:44 GMT -8
This is cap circumvention. Reject.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Spitfires GM on Jun 11, 2022 18:00:04 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Spitfires GM on Jun 11, 2022 18:01:22 GMT -8
This is cap circumvention. Reject. Yes, but it's only for this season, not 3 or 4. |
|
|
|
Post by Texas Rattlesnakes GM on Jun 11, 2022 18:41:40 GMT -8
Hopefully this is allowed. Otherwise we need to make like 4 trades or something to get the same end result lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Texas Rattlesnakes GM on Jun 11, 2022 18:41:53 GMT -8
Accept btw
|
|
|
|
Post by Player Representative on Jun 11, 2022 19:08:52 GMT -8
Since both teams are not good rn, he accepts
|
|
|
|
Post by Aachen der Adlers GM on Jun 11, 2022 19:10:09 GMT -8
This is cap circumvention…
Amsterdam has to trade something to receive something. It can be some piece of shit AHLer that wouldn’t even play in the ECHL but he has to trade something.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Spitfires GM on Jun 11, 2022 19:21:44 GMT -8
This is cap circumvention… Amsterdam has to trade something to receive something. It can be some piece of shit AHLer that wouldn’t even play in the ECHL but he has to trade something. Yes, except it's being done for expiring deals, not on tenure deals. 🤷 So, it's perfectly acceptable for you to fleece other people, but when I don't, there's a problem? 🤦😂😂🖕 |
|
|
|
Post by Aachen der Adlers GM on Jun 11, 2022 19:36:24 GMT -8
No it’s that in any of those deals everybody is trading at least one item from their team whether it is a player or a pick. Even future considerations (that he’d have to honour within the season) would be suitable enough. But he has to trade something tangible.
And Kruze, this has nothing to do with you, we’ve rejected trades in the past exactly like this because that’s cap circumvention. Any team involved in a trade has to move a player or pick, doesn’t matter who, but it needs to be something tangible (ie you can’t trade cap space).
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Spitfires GM on Jun 11, 2022 19:44:05 GMT -8
No it’s that in any of those deals everybody is trading at least one item from their team whether it is a player or a pick. Even future considerations (that he’d have to honour within the season) would be suitable enough. But he has to trade something tangible. And Kruze, this has nothing to do with you, we’ve rejected trades in the past exactly like this because that’s cap circumvention. Any team involved in a trade has to move a player or pick, doesn’t matter who, but it needs to be something tangible (ie you can’t trade cap space). Ironic, isn't it?! 🤔 The very thing you're arguing against now is the same thing you were arguing for, basically 10secs ago lol So the rules only work for you Joubie? Is that it? 🙄🤦😂😂 |
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Spitfires GM on Jun 11, 2022 19:50:10 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by Aachen der Adlers GM on Jun 12, 2022 3:02:06 GMT -8
No it’s that in any of those deals everybody is trading at least one item from their team whether it is a player or a pick. Even future considerations (that he’d have to honour within the season) would be suitable enough. But he has to trade something tangible. And Kruze, this has nothing to do with you, we’ve rejected trades in the past exactly like this because that’s cap circumvention. Any team involved in a trade has to move a player or pick, doesn’t matter who, but it needs to be something tangible (ie you can’t trade cap space). Ironic, isn't it?! 🤔 The very thing you're arguing against now is the same thing you were arguing for, basically 10secs ago lol So the rules only work for you Joubie? Is that it? 🙄🤦😂😂 Is what I’m saying going over your head? You can do this trade, Amsterdam just has to trade something. He can trade a 60 overall 40 year old player for all we care but SOMETHING has to be traded from him that is tangible. |
|
|
|
Post by Milwaukee Mighty Drunks GM on Jun 12, 2022 4:05:35 GMT -8
i agree with danbury. it makes sense. so here ya go kruze add this piece of shit to the deal. you get him for free  with kivranta added i accept LW/RW Joel Kiviranta SNP 81 (29) 1.0M UFA 2026 |
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Jun 12, 2022 6:07:21 GMT -8
Let me know if you guys are adding Kivi to the deal, but the 2nd RD is tangible enough and this deal is final pending word on Kiviranta from Seattle Spitfires GM |
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Spitfires GM on Jun 12, 2022 6:34:11 GMT -8
Let me know if you guys are adding Kivi to the deal, but the 2nd RD is tangible enough and this deal is final pending word on Kiviranta from Seattle Spitfires GM Exactly... No Kiviranta, doesn't need to be involved. It's fine. |
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Jun 12, 2022 9:45:46 GMT -8
Upon discussion with Aachen der Adlers GM on Discord. I realize I was misunderstanding his point. He’s actually right about this. AMS can’t just receive without giving something. CAP payments don’t count in that equation. This trade has been edited, by me to include Kiviranta like AMS was offering. Discussed with SEA on Discord. Go ahead and like this post Seattle Spitfires GM and Milwaukee Mighty Drunks GM to confirm this |
|
![](https://imgur.com/bAG6Crp.png""){kind=small}
