|
Post by Atlanta Thrashers GM on Jan 23, 2022 8:26:07 GMT -8
To C Jonathan Toews TWF 86 (35) 6.6M UFA 2024 - 50% retained by MIN (3.3M) - 25% retained by CLE (1.65M) To RW/LW Jan Jenik SNP 78 (23) .750M UFA 2025 ATL 2nd this draft ATL 2nd next draft To C Kalan Lind PLY 66 (18) .850M RFA 2026 Essentially Minny is trading Toews to me 50% off, but he makes a stop in Cleveland so he can retain money for a free prospect.
|
|
|
Post by steinkej4 on Jan 23, 2022 8:28:37 GMT -8
Can a guy have more than 50% retained?
no?
”-Teams are allowed to carry 3 ACTIVE SALARY RETENTIONS at ONCE (max retention amount is 50% each contract)”
Reject/Final to the 3 admin trade
|
|
|
Post by Atlanta Thrashers GM on Jan 23, 2022 8:31:28 GMT -8
Can a guy have more than 50% retained? no? ”-Teams are allowed to carry 3 ACTIVE SALARY RETENTIONS at ONCE (max retention amount is 50% each contract)” Reject/Final to the 3 admin trade Yeah, he just can't have more than 50% retained on his current amount by a team. I traded for Spurgeon with another 25% last TD, but he was already acquired for 50%. The Leafs acquired Foligno at 25% last TD doing this
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Jan 23, 2022 8:45:37 GMT -8
My intention here has always been to allow for as much of the irl stuff as feasible. ATL asked me about this last season, and I said I was good with type of trade in theory. I just want to make sure it doesn’t start to get stupid around here with players playing at 25% on every team.
This doesn’t happen a ton irl because there’s actual dollars at play, and someone has to foot the bill. Obviously we have the salary cap, so that limits it to an extent. I’m not gonna reject it on those merits right now. But I really think this specific kinda deal needs to be limited to the trade deadline-ish. Maybe only at the trade pause (feb28th in game, usually a weekend irl for us) as a way to beef up deadline activity?
Let’s see what everyone else thinks. I don’t want this approved until some people actual say how they feel
|
|
|
Post by Iasi Scorpions GM on Jan 23, 2022 9:33:34 GMT -8
reject, Toews carries a lot more value than that, especially at 1.65M. To double down on the same player in the same trade lol. Would have to be admins's to even think about pulling that one off. Big time reject on this!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Aachen der Adlers GM on Jan 23, 2022 9:41:31 GMT -8
It’s allowed in the CBA so should be allowed here.
|
|
|
Post by Iasi Scorpions GM on Jan 23, 2022 9:44:26 GMT -8
It’s allowed in the CBA so should be allowed here. we have 26 teams with funny names, I don't think the CBA really has anything to do with it anymore. It is what we wish to allow in this!!
|
|
|
Post by Dinamo Riga GM on Jan 23, 2022 10:56:54 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:08:34 GMT -8
I don’t have an issue with it happening, just don’t like the idea of a whole season at 25% I think we should allow it only on expiring deals, and trades after DEC 1st personally Both the deals that happened before were at the deadline basically
|
|
|
Post by Iasi Scorpions GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:12:20 GMT -8
But this is twice in the same trade. To me that is way too much and playing with rules to an extreme and should be stopped.
|
|
|
Post by Dinamo Riga GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:23:26 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Dinamo Riga GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:29:34 GMT -8
I don’t have an issue with it happening, just don’t like the idea of a whole season at 25% I think we should allow it only on expiring deals, and trades after DEC 1st personally Both the deals that happened before were at the deadline basically I don't hate either of those points (though I don't see how allowing it in December vs October makes a huge difference, thats like 20 games, seems like an uneccessary extra rule to me) I will say though, is it really that big of a deal, when ATL could just go sign a guy like Pageau 85 C for probably that same 1.65m cap hit?
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:31:48 GMT -8
It’s been done, irl and here. It is allowed, but I just think WE should maybe come up parameters for this type of deal where 50% has been retained by 2 separate teams
It can set a precedence here, so I think it deserves discussion because this is different than what was approved before, I think
|
|
|
Post by Macon Whoopee GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:33:36 GMT -8
I don't see anything wrong with it. I don't think that a contract should go below 25% for the team that gets the player.
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:35:32 GMT -8
I don’t have an issue with it happening, just don’t like the idea of a whole season at 25% I think we should allow it only on expiring deals, and trades after DEC 1st personally Both the deals that happened before were at the deadline basically I don't hate either of those points (though I don't see how allowing it in December vs October makes a huge difference, thats like 20 games, seems like an uneccessary extra rule to me) I will say though, is it really that big of a deal, when ATL could just go sign a guy like Pageau 85 C for probably that same 1.65m cap hit? I get what you’re saying. But I think we need to set it somewhere. I’m just throwing out ideas I really don’t want to start seeing deals with Matthews or McDavid type players at 25% cap hit signed to multiple years. Someone will push the envelope, so it’s better to just set a boundary now And no, Pageau will not sign for that. Offers like that haven’t even been responded to. Those guys will sign overseas or retire.
|
|
|
Post by Dinamo Riga GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:43:33 GMT -8
I get what you’re saying. But I think we need to set it somewhere. I’m just throwing out ideas I really don’t want to start seeing deals with Matthews or McDavid type players at 25% cap hit signed to multiple years. Someone will push the envelope, so it’s better to just set a boundary now Yeah the "only in their final year" rule makes perfect sense IMO. Literally an ATL signing: ps5hl.proboards.com/thread/914/cam-atkinson
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:51:04 GMT -8
I don’t know, I think there’s a difference between a 34 year old guaranteed to get a downgrade next season, who also happens to be 84. And Pageau at 85 (30)
|
|
|
Post by Iasi Scorpions GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:54:18 GMT -8
EVERYTHING HAS BEEN TRADE DEADLINE DEALS. THIS IS THE START OF THE SEASON AND IS CRAZY TO ALLOW FROM THE START OF A SEASON. IT IS MAKING A JOKE ABOUT THIS PROCESS!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Iasi Scorpions GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:57:07 GMT -8
I get what you’re saying. But I think we need to set it somewhere. I’m just throwing out ideas I really don’t want to start seeing deals with Matthews or McDavid type players at 25% cap hit signed to multiple years. Someone will push the envelope, so it’s better to just set a boundary now Yeah the "only in their final year" rule makes perfect sense IMO. Literally an ATL signing: ps5hl.proboards.com/thread/914/cam-atkinsonSo our PR likes to kiss some ass for the stacked teams from time to time. Thanks for pointing that out for us though
|
|
|
Post by Dinamo Riga GM on Jan 23, 2022 11:59:24 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Jan 23, 2022 12:06:22 GMT -8
EVERYTHING HAS BEEN TRADE DEADLINE DEALS. THIS IS THE START OF THE SEASON AND IS CRAZY TO ALLOW FROM THE START OF A SEASON. IT IS MAKING A JOKE ABOUT THIS PROCESS!!!! I don’t think this makes a joke of the process. This IS THE PROCESS. We’re working though it First time for this kinda trade really. So it’s everybody’s job to speak up about how they feel so we can shape our rules. No different than a real life league Another potential part of this, Toews started out in ATL at the trade deadline yeah? Couldn’t get re-signed maybe? I don’t know. But now we’re a few months (sim time) later and he’s back but at 25%? says if they allow it irl, allow it here. Well, irl ATL could be investigated for cap circumvention. I’m not saying that’s what happened, (seriously I don’t think that) but again, that’s why you don’t see these deals like this DEC on expiring contracts makes the most sense
|
|
|
Post by Atlanta Thrashers GM on Jan 23, 2022 13:47:22 GMT -8
I really dont see the difference between OCT and DEC other than 15-20 games tbh, the same deal will probably just be made then
|
|
|
Post by steinkej4 on Jan 23, 2022 13:50:13 GMT -8
I really dont see the difference between OCT and DEC other than 15-20 games tbh, the same deal will probably just be made then You guys are admins. You should have these figured out before posting. You shouldn’t be the center of controversy
|
|
|
Post by Atlanta Thrashers GM on Jan 23, 2022 13:59:27 GMT -8
I really dont see the difference between OCT and DEC other than 15-20 games tbh, the same deal will probably just be made then You guys are admins. You should have these figured out before posting. You shouldn’t be the center of controversy I forgot some of these trades are the next episode of the Bachelor for some of you. There really isn't a controversy. A trade was posted and is being reviewed. It's a sim league, no one involved in the trade seems to care nearly as much as some within this thread.
|
|
|
Post by Iceland Crazy Vikings GM on Jan 23, 2022 14:02:45 GMT -8
Let's get a decision here guys. Needs one more like or a couple rejects. I think it's a fair payment for a 35 year old due for an automatic downgrade.
|
|
|
Post by Red Deer Rebels GM on Jan 23, 2022 14:02:55 GMT -8
I'm good with it.
|
|
|
Post by Traktor Chelyabinsk GM on Jan 23, 2022 14:09:48 GMT -8
i accept my role in this
|
|
|
Post by Slovan Stags GM on Jan 23, 2022 14:17:24 GMT -8
This is final pending Sokolina Hussars GM I only wanted everyone on board with what’s allowed and isn’t.
|
|
|
Post by Sokolina Hussars GM on Jan 23, 2022 17:22:06 GMT -8
I'd like to see a better offer than what I got here cause I didn't get a single bite until ATL reached out, so anyone complaining about value should send a better offer or shut the fuck up.
Accept
|
|
|
Post by Iasi Scorpions GM on Jan 23, 2022 17:23:40 GMT -8
what a joke guys, anybody want any of my players find another guys and I am sure you get him at 25% and just give up a prospect that is never gonna play anywhere. Let me know I all in to help out anybody in there division!!
|
|